Category Archives: Marketing/Communications

Tumblr Buys Yahoo

This week Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer bought blogging platform and social media site Tumblr for an estimated $1.1 billion.   Although in a company press statement Mayer promised that she would “not screw it up,” one of the major changes Tumblr users can expect is advertising.

One of the best things about Tumblr, other than a plethora of moving screen shots, is its lack of advertisements.  But let’s face it; companies have to make a profit.  My biggest question is what type of ads will be put on Tumblr?

Yahoo tends to cater to an older generation where as Tumblr’s target audience are Gen Y’s and Millennials.  Will Tumblr start trying to attract an older crowd or will Yahoo try to be cooler?  Whatever happens it’s just sad to see such a creative and personal space being diluted with advertisements. But as we all know, no space is sacred on the Internet.

A positive though is that Yahoo promises to refine Tumblr’s personalized search technology to make it easier for users to find bloggers that they will likely enjoy.  The biggest problem I have with Tumblr is its search function.  There is just so much out there and not enough refinement.  I remember when I first created a Tumblr about a year ago I felt bombarded by categories and often had to utilize outside sources to find bloggers I liked.

Only time will tell how this relationship plays out or if Mayer will keep her promise. But one thing is for certain — expect more ads.

How not to gain a million followers on Twitter

Twitter has proven itself to be a valuable tool in business-to-business communications. However, too often an account is deemed successful simply because it has a large number of followers.

It’s challenging work gaining new followers and engaging them in a conversation. I’m currently in charge of four accounts — three for clients and one of my own that I routinely ignore. The top account has followers numbering in the low thousands. It continues to gather new followers, add retweets and garner new mentions each month.  Of course I would like, but never expect, it to join top dogs like Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber, President Obama and the New York Times — accounts with millions of followers.

Then today, I received an email offering 1 million Twitter followers for $2,950. Wow, that’s still short of cracking the top 1,000, but within potential range of Twitter middleweights such as Paul McCartney, Carrie Underwood, the MythBusters TV show and aged playboy, Hugh Heffner.

Wouldn’t almost any client be ecstatic to have more than 1 million followers? And it would cost them less than a third of a penny each. Unfortunately, the offer goes against good Twitter business practices and I can’t recommend the idea. Here’s why:

  • No doubt the vast majority of new followers would be egg heads — the fake accounts without a profile picture or bio that use the egg logo supplied by Twitter. These accounts follow many, but have few followers, if any, of their own. They largely exist to inflate the number of followers of legitimate accounts. In the summer of 2011, presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was accused of buying too many of his 1.3 million followers. His large following backfired on him.
  • This type of follower, even if real, isn’t sincerely committed to a company, candidate or celebrity. Within a short time, they will go away or just sit without ever offering a retweet, mention or direct message. They will not help to attract legitimate followers or drive new business opportunities.
  • A Twitter account can’t be judged successful solely on how many followers it has. It should be attracting the best group of followers for your organization. You want people, real people, to be interested in what you have to say. You want to showcase your expertise. You want to engage in conversations. You want to create opportunities to expand your influence and gain business. If dedicated, a smaller band of followers is always preferable.

It would be nice to claim more than a million followers for each of my accounts. But for the vast majority of businesses, that’s not going to happen. Like just about everything in life, a successful Twitter presence takes hard work. You need to understand your market. You need to stay on top of industry events. You need to identify and follow major influencers. You need to tweet at times to best reach your followers. You need to tweet often enough, but not too much. And all that may win you only five to 10 new followers on a good day, but you’ll know you’re doing it the right way.

Remember Email? It’s Still a Great Marketing Tool

Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter and You Tube bring you the celebrity spats, videos of cute, one-eyed cats and cool infographics.

And email…well, its still good for sharing a document with a business associate, same as it’s been doing since last century. Lately, it’s better known for offers of knock-off pharmaceuticals.

Yet at the same time, email is more engrained into our society than any of the social media platforms. Do you know anyone from a teenager to a senior citizen that doesn’t have an email address?

Twitter has more than 100 million accounts in the U.S., but up to 25 percent of them are never used. Facebook just topped 1 billion users worldwide. Still, Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail, together and alone, tops that number. And one study showed that 72 percent of people check their email more than six times per day.

This all means email is still a vibrant, effective means for reaching current and potential customers with tailored marketing messages. The key is having a quality list. Some companies keep their customer lists up-to-date and continually add leads from the sales staff. Most aren’t that conscientious about it. In that case you may need to buy a list from an email address provider. Count on your PR consultant to help you find the right list provider for your needs.

Next up is creating a message that will get recipients to pay attention. You can take a straight-forward or a more lighthearted approach. But one way to get people to read your message is to get them involved. Ask them questions. Are you getting what you need? Is your business all it can be? What problems do you need solved?

When you get replies, respond immediately. Use the information you get back from your questions to craft a tailored response for each. At that point your emails will stand out from the unsolicited clutter that jams many mailboxes.

Keep the campaign going. Offer your list something they need. Listen to your potential customers and respond accordingly.

Do this and you’ll be well on your way to a successful email campaign. Meantime, don’t forget the growing power of social media. Just don’t underestimate the value of email.

@JDaum

 

 

Everybody’s a Twitter expert (well, maybe)

 

Everyone’s jumping on Twitter these days with links to blogs offering advice about how business owners can use the platform to greatly increase profits.

Read them and you’ll know how many Tweets to post each day. Well, maybe you will. Some say three, others say six are better.

There are supporters of posting between 8 to 10 a.m. ET (a little early for anyone living west of Kansas), while others say 1 to 3 p.m. ET is the sweet spot. Longer or shorter tweets? They each have their supporters.  Is a single hash tag enough? Are four too many?

All this points out what I’m learning from running three Twitter accounts and helping out on another — there are no one-size-fits-all solutions.  Every business, every industry is different.

One tweet I read recently really hit home. A woman complained about an online job posting for marketing position that required a minimum of 10 years of social media experience. I assume that job will go unfilled for the next few years. Ten years ago there was no Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, Tumblr, Instagram or other major social media platform.

Anyone involved in social media is still a pioneer. Run from anyone who tells you he or she knows exactly what will work for your business. Instead be ready to work with someone willing to experiment and take reasonable chances to find the program that works best for you.

There is no doubt social media can be a huge PR and marketing boost. So go ahead and read these ‘experts.’ There is a little something to be learned from each blog — including this one.

Of course, that’s just my humble opinion.

– JD

Twitter: @jdaum

 

Small Businesses Say Social Media Helps Them Grow

Small business owners are catching on to social media in a big way. And many of them are reporting some impressive results.

A recent survey of 614 U.S. small business owners showed that 90 percent are actively engaged in social networking sites. And about three of four said those sites are as valuable — or more so — than in-person networking.

More than a third of the respondents said being found by new customers was the most valuable benefit of social media. Impressively, 78 percent said that over the past year they gained a quarter or more of their new customers through online or social media channels.

But the large number of available options — Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Google+, Pinterest, Groupon and other channels — is overwhelming for many small business owners.

This is where an experienced social media consultant can help. Choosing the right channels and then keeping them filled with regularly updated, quality content can make the difference between social media success and failure. The same holds true of a company website, which one in four of the survey respondents said was an important business driver.

The time has come when a small business owner not engaging or properly using social media is at a competitive disadvantage.

Click here for more details on the recent survey sponsored by a small business online community.

-JD

Twitter: @jdaum

 

 

Can Companies Still Afford Trade Shows?

A question many companies are asking — are trade shows still worth the investment? More than one marketing manager and CFO is trying to balance the shows’ upfront costs with return on investment.

A major national show may cost start-up companies $20,000 or more for a small booth in the back of the hall, employee travel and other related costs. Large multi-national companies can easily drop $1 million or more for huge booths, onsite staff and wining and dining top customers.

Trade show sponsors, exhibit builders and convention center operators will tell you that any recent falloff in attendance is due largely to a tight economy. They say a show’s face-to-face interaction is irreplaceable. Yet as major exhibitors pull out of shows, the stigma smaller companies face for also not attending has decreased.

So if companies don’t choose the trade show route, what are the alternatives?

Many trade publications offer virtual shows that let shoppers chat online with company reps and receive information about new products and solutions via email. The cost is great, but customers acceptance still leaves these not ready to replace the traditional trade show.

Some companies, either alone or with related service/product providers, are sponsoring their own traveling road shows. A five- to 10-city effort can reach existing and potential customers where they live at a cost equal to one traditional tradeshow. I’ve seen these work well.

I’ve also seen successful variations with companies skipping the trade show exhibit hall and securing hospitality suites to provide an intimate place to showcase products and services to key or would-be customers. Granted, if too many potential exhibitors try this option, the shows will close. Other relatively new and often successful ideas are webinars, podcasts and blogs, often hosted on company or trade media websites. They have the ability to reach hundreds to thousands of targeted groups for a very modest investment.

Obviously, the economy has squeezed trade shows. But when the economy rebounds, will they still be a prime marketing choice or will the newer alternatives take over?  What are your thoughts?

– JD

Twitter: @Jdaum

 

 

 

 

 

Should Brands Create Controversies?

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve heard about how the president of Chick-Fil-A, Dan Cathy, feels about same sex marriage.  In an interview with the Baptist Press  he took a controversial stance and created an uproar that might have put the fast food joint in jeopardy.

Interestingly enough, this move did wonders for his bottom line. Anti-gay marriage supporters dedicated an appreciation day to the chain, giving it one of the highest grossing sales days it’s ever had.

As a public relations professional, I have to wonder: was Mr. Cathy’s public stance on such a controversial issue intentional?   It came to my attention that almost three quarters of Chick-Fil-A locations are in the more conservative Southern states.  Could this have been a planned PR move in order to boost sales primarily in these areas?

It’s an interesting thought. Marketing departments work hard to create relatable and attractive brand images. So the idea of starting a firestorm seems a bit risky.  Maybe it’s a case where bad press can be good press, too.

So do you think this was an intentional move? Is it a good tactic for brands to create controversy in order to boost visibility and sales?

@SaraAlisia

 

Hard to Top This One…

Image: ABC News

Somewhere in this country there are highly creative marketing minds buzzing with hot ideas to grab headlines this summer. Here’s a great example.

Trojan, best known as a condom provider, recently added vibrators to its product line. And my hat’s off to the person or team that suggested giving them away this week from hot dog carts in New York City. Trojan used its Facebook site to provide the carts’ locations and hundreds of women — and a few men — lined up for a freebie.

Before the company could give its allotment away, the city closed down the effort for failing to have proper permits. And that really turned the local and national media loose. Headlines such as “City KOs good vibrations” are priceless.

City officials caved under the pressure and agreed to allow Trojan to continue with its plans. A day later, the “Pleasure Carts” were back on the streets — this time in the city’s meatpacking district.

– JD

Twitter: @Jdaum

Can English Survive Social Media?

Is the informality of email and social media leading to the ruin of the English language? Is proper grammar and correct spelling going the way of the wired telephone? The answers to those questions are troubling many corporate communications executives.

We have come to accept slang and shortcuts in our electronic communications.  The grammar used is often spotty and let’s politely assume that the numerous misspellings we see are typos.

So a tweet contains “c u l8er” instead of “see you later” in order to save space in a message with a maximum of 140 characters.  Later in a text message you might read “Mary and myself will handle that.” Then a news release posted on a company Internet site may include that the “Acme Corp. is known for providing their customers with world-class service.” That may not be a problem among friends, but that same writing style is unacceptable when used in external corporate communications.

The blame for our eroding standards is often placed on younger employees who have been raised in a social media era. That’s not entirely fair. All of us regularly engaging in social media take many of the same shortcuts and make many of the same grammatical and spelling mistakes.

We just have to consider social media communications as a different language.  The way we communicate to friends via Facebook or Twitter is fine. But, for the time being, that informality has no place in the way we communicate on behalf of or our employers or clients.

In time, much of the social media vernacular will become an accepted part of the language. But until then, we need to remind ourselves — and our employees — of the need for accurate and clear communications in a business setting.

– JD

Twitter: @Jdaum

Guerrilla Marketing: Do YOU Deserve to Die?

Guerrilla marketing often aims to offend people in order to gain their attention.  It’s not for every organization, but it can work.  Officials at the Lung Cancer Alliance seem to have a good understanding of the concept.  The group recently launched a campaign that includes posters saying things like: “The tattooed deserve to die” and “Cat lovers deserve to die.”

What the..? Hey! I love cats!

 

Upon visiting the group’s website, you see a countdown clock until the big reveal of a mysterious disease that doesn’t discriminate: lung cancer.  The clock has been removed and replaced with:

“Many people believe that if you have lung cancer you did something to deserve it. It sounds absurd, but it’s true. Lung cancer doesn’t discriminate and neither should you.  Help put an end to the stigma and the disease.”

The American Lung Association has always been the top dog when it comes raising awareness/funding for lung cancer research.  But this guerilla marketing campaign really put the small Lung Cancer Alliance on the map.  I had honestly never heard of the group until recently.  Many angry comments posted across social media sites prompted me to check it out.

Well done.  I see what you did there, Lung Cancer Alliance.  You let the ticked off people do your dirty work for you.  Here are some excerpts from the Lung Cancer Alliance Facebook page:

 

Some would argue for the end of this campaign. It’s certainly not appropriate for all issues or groups.  But for a small, cash-strapped non-profit trying to raise awareness about a deadly disease, I applaud the effort.

 

@saraalisia